LeBlueDolphin
New member
Hello,
I believe the wording and enforcement of this rule do not match. Today I was sentenced to 1 hour in jail for "Illegal Mod/Macro" on the Pixelmon Blue server. If someone were to be using a script of some kind to send some sort of input which happens to allow them to bypass Anti-AFK, then I personally would not consider them being given an advantage in game. I gave the staff on-duty who had jailed me a short hypothetical about a player using some sort of physical (real life) mechanism that manipulated their mouse and/or keyboard in some way and had asked if that would be considered a client (with the rule being given to me as context) and they told me that in their opinion, they did not believe this mechanism to match the language used in the rule, they would not consider this a "client" but they advised against something like this in the event a staffmember construed this as being a "mod/client."
I think either the language of the rule should change in the rule to account for its flexible enforcement by staff or somehow ComplexGaming should make it known that its staff will punish players they suspect are breaking a rule but do not have to be sure.
If you would like the whole situation, the chat is recorded on the pixelmon-blue text channel on the discord and starts with me saying in chat, "test" at 6:45am EST.
I believe the wording and enforcement of this rule do not match. Today I was sentenced to 1 hour in jail for "Illegal Mod/Macro" on the Pixelmon Blue server. If someone were to be using a script of some kind to send some sort of input which happens to allow them to bypass Anti-AFK, then I personally would not consider them being given an advantage in game. I gave the staff on-duty who had jailed me a short hypothetical about a player using some sort of physical (real life) mechanism that manipulated their mouse and/or keyboard in some way and had asked if that would be considered a client (with the rule being given to me as context) and they told me that in their opinion, they did not believe this mechanism to match the language used in the rule, they would not consider this a "client" but they advised against something like this in the event a staffmember construed this as being a "mod/client."
I think either the language of the rule should change in the rule to account for its flexible enforcement by staff or somehow ComplexGaming should make it known that its staff will punish players they suspect are breaking a rule but do not have to be sure.
If you would like the whole situation, the chat is recorded on the pixelmon-blue text channel on the discord and starts with me saying in chat, "test" at 6:45am EST.